您现在的位置是: 首页 > 作文大全 作文大全

关于教育的英语作文题目_关于教育的英语作文题目有哪些

ysladmin 2024-05-18 人已围观

简介关于教育的英语作文题目_关于教育的英语作文题目有哪些       随着科技的发展,关于教育的英语作文题目的今日更新也在不断地推陈出新。今天,我将为大家详细介绍它的今日更新,让我们一起了解它的最新技术。1.谁可以帮我找一篇关于中西方教育理念的英语

关于教育的英语作文题目_关于教育的英语作文题目有哪些

       随着科技的发展,关于教育的英语作文题目的今日更新也在不断地推陈出新。今天,我将为大家详细介绍它的今日更新,让我们一起了解它的最新技术。

1.谁可以帮我找一篇关于中西方教育理念的英语作文?

2.有关教育的英语文章教育美文

3.英语作文:对小孩的教育(Education for children)

4.关于教育的重要性高中英语作文

5.关于思想教育方面的英文文章(急)

6.急求英文作文:教育对社会的作用或者是影响、贡献 急求,在线等

关于教育的英语作文题目_关于教育的英语作文题目有哪些

谁可以帮我找一篇关于中西方教育理念的英语作文?

       一The Differences of Education between America and China

       Education is culture, and different educations show different societies’ culture. Americans regard education as the means by which the inequalities among individuals are to be erased and by which every desirable end is to be achieved. While Chinese education is for foundation education, but students may be not learn much. But all in all, different education systems account for the different phenomenon, because different society backgrounds and different culture helps human create a different country in the world.

       </FONT></SPAN>The different society structure plays an important part in the education system. In China, all those who can enter the University have received an elite education and before enrollment they have devoted themselves to hard studying. Therefore, they are good at getting high marks on mathematics, psychics and so on. However, they are lack of chances to practice skills in real world thus having no social experiences. In that case, after graduation, most students find it difficult to find a satisfactory job though many of them get a job through the relationship net.

       </FONT></SPAN>While in America, the education system pays more attention to social skills than to marks .Students have developed the ability to be independence in life and work. After university, they show great capability of thinking, innovation and creation which make them keep pace with the modern world. They are competent for the challenging work and can gain a good job in America with ease.

       </FONT></SPAN>There is a huge gap on education between America and China, but we can’t say which one is right or wrong, ‘cause each of the education system is based on the different backgrounds, American education should be following the American’s culture, meanwhile, Chinese education has to follow Chinese culture. A good education model for China is very important to the learning process, and also is very hard. But the most important thing we need is the modern education which is internationalization education system and

有关教育的英语文章教育美文

       写作思路:简述中西方教育的差异,写出自己的观点,表达出自己对于现代教育的关切。

       正文:

       Western education is a kind of trial education, let students try first, accumulate experience and draw conclusions from it, and get their own research results. Western education attaches importance to people-oriented, which is conducive to the cultivation of students' innovative ability.

       西方教育是一种尝试教育,先让学生尝试,从中积累经验得出结论,得到的属于自己研究的成果。西方教育重视以人为本,利于培养学生创新能力。

       Chinese education is a kind of indoctrinated examination oriented education, which directly tells the students of adult experience, so that they can remember and accept it. Results the students lack of innovative thinking.

       中国教育是一种灌输式应试教育,直接把成人的经验告知学生,让学生记住并接受。结果学生缺乏创新思维。

       Western parents cultivate and exercise their children's sense of independence and ability to live independently from an early age. We should attach importance to children's self-training and their free development, and strive to cultivate children into social people who can adapt to various environments and have independent survival ability.

       西方家长从小就培养和锻炼孩子的自立意识和独立生活能力。重视孩子从小的自身锻炼,注重孩子的自由发展,努力把孩子培养成为能够适应各种环境,具备独立生存能力的社会人。

       Chinese parents, in addition to double concern in life, parents are most concerned about their children's academic achievements. It seems that learning well is omnipotent, but little attention is paid to children's independent living ability, social adaptability, mental health level, moral sentiment and citizen consciousness, and some even ignore it completely.

       中国家长,除了生活上加倍关心外,家长最关心的是孩子的学习成绩。似乎学习好就是万能的,而对孩子的独立生活能力、社会适应能力、心理健康程度、道德情操以及公民意识等则关心甚少,有的甚至完全不顾。

       From birth to adulthood, parents have almost everything for their

       children, such as cooking, washing clothes, cleaning, saving money for

       their children to go to university, go abroad, get married, raise

       children, etc. Foreign parents pay attention to the Chinese parents'

       neglect.

       从孩子出生到成年,家长几乎把孩子的一切都包了下来,做饭、洗衣服、打扫、攒钱供孩子读大学、出国、结婚、养儿育女等。外国家长重视的恰恰是中国家长忽视的。

       Whether it is school education or family education, we must attach importance to the cultivation of children's ability while paying attention to their academic performance, so that they can adapt to various environments from childhood. Let children have independent thinking, adapt to social changes.

       无论是学校教育还是家庭教育,在重视孩子学习成绩的同时,必须重视孩子能力的培养,让他能从小适应各种环境。让孩子拥有独立思考,适应社会各种变化的人。

英语作文:对小孩的教育(Education for children)

       

       教育是人类永恒的话题,人从在妈妈的肚子里就会要接收到教育,下面让我们来看一些有关教育的英文文章吧。

有关教育的英语文章

       Traditional Teaching Method

       Do your teachers still use traditional techniques to teach you nowadays? A revol- ution in teaching techniques is required now. In the past, we just took it for granted that a teacher' s aim was to teach the students all that he knew and solve all the problems for them. Therefore, students could mot judge things on their own under this circumstance. Thus students gradually lost the ability to learn by themselves. In addition, they were only equipped with the knowledge that were taught in class and made the same judgement upon every problem which might crop up. Of course, they would find their knowledge not enough to solve practical problems.

       

       So it is time to change the teaching method. A teacher' s goal is to help the students develop not only the ability to learn by themselves but the skills to make judgements on every aspect on their own. It' s not necessary for the students to turn to teachers for help while meeting with difficulties. The first thing is to develop the students' abilities to make sound judgements upon any problem and overe difficulties.

       All in all, the aim of teaching is to liberate, but mot to fetter the students' innate powers of making sound judgements.

       大概翻译:

       内容:传统教学方法

       你们的老师仍使用传统技术,现在教你?阿revol在教学技巧ution现在需要。在过去,我们只是把它理所当然地认为一老师的目的是要教导学生,他知道,解决他们的所有问题。因此,学生可以摩托罗拉自行判断在此情况下的东西。因此,学生们逐渐失去了学习能力本身。此外,他们只配备了那些在课堂上教授时所作的每一个问题,可能会突然出现相同的判断的知识。当然,他们会发现自己的知识不足以解决实际问题。

       因此,现在是改变教学方法。甲老师的目标是帮助学生发展,不仅学习的能力,但自己的技能,就在自己的每一个方面的判断。那不为学生需要寻求帮助教师在会见困难。首先是培养学生的能力作出的任何问题,正确的判断和克服困难。

       总之,教学是解放的目标,但摩托罗拉束缚作出正确的判断学生的固有权力。

有关教育的英语文章

       Throughout the millennia, students of all ages in China have had to endure the miseries of learning by rote. Teachers have stifled creativity in the pursuit of the accumulation of facts, and parents have forced children to spend mind-numbing hours cramming for exams. But for the past year, the government has been experimenting with what could amount to revolutionary changes in China's classrooms. The aim is to make education more pleasant, more useful and, above all, to challenge students to think for themselves.

       What has prompted the reforms is a belated recognition that China's education system is failing to produce enough innovative thinkers. In addition, students are deeply unhappy. A survey conducted by the Education Ministry five years ago found more than 80% of students disliked school. Dropout rates have been rising in rural areas—partly for economic reasons but also because of the stultifying atmosphere of their classrooms. Exam pressures frequently lead to suicides. According to a survey last year among senior secondary-school students and university freshmen in one area, more than 50% had considered killing themselves.

       Several other countries in East Asia, including Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, are grappling with similar problems. But the implications of China's reform efforts are particularly profound. China's traditional education methods are ideally suited to a political culture that requires citizens to submit blindly to authority. By encouraging students to question their teachers and regard them as equals even official literature now talks of fostering a “democratic” atmosphere in classrooms, China could be ushering in a new kind of relationship between the rulers and the ruled.

       The problem is making it work. The government has set ambitious targets with few resources to ensure that the country's more than 10m primary- and secondary-school teachers acquire the skills and determination to change the habits of a lifetime. The reforms started in September 2001 with about 420,000 primary- and junior secondary-school students out of a national total of more than 215m taking part in 38 experimental zones around the country. In September this year, participation increased to 9.1m pupils in 572 zones. These figures will double next year. The Education Ministry's original idea had been to implement the reforms nationwide by 2010. But according to Liu Jian of the ministry's National Centre for School Curriculum and Textbook Development, employers from a variety of enterprises said they wanted a quicker timetable. So now the target is 2005. In 2004, similar experiments will start in secondary schools

关于教育的重要性高中英语作文

       对小孩的教育(Education for children)

        In some countries, there are children who are educated by their parents at home instead of being taught by teachers at school. Do you think this is a good or bad idea? Think of its advantages and disadvantages.

        With the development of society, it is more easy and convenient for us to study home by ourselves. And many parents educate their children at home instead of at school. There are advantages and disadvantages for both ways.

        The main reason why parents choose to teach their children at home is that it is a good method to teach students in accordance with their aptitude. For every child has different hobbies and talent, teaching them at home can help them find and develop their being genius effectively.

        On the other hand, the healthy overall development of a child attributes to many integrated factors. Some extracurricular activities are beneficial supplement to be classroom instruction. And if children are encouraged to attend only academic activities, their overall development will inevitably be hindered. Their individualities and originalities will undoubtedly be impaired, because our society a diversified one. Children should be encouraged to get in touch with various aspects as society to attain a more comprehensive knowledge.

        So in my opinion, it is better to teach children by teacher at school.

        对小孩的教育

        在一些国家,有的小孩不是在学校由老师授课来接受教育而是选择在家由他们的家长自己来教。你认为这样的想法好还是不妥?说说优缺点。

        随着社会的发展,我们越来越方便在家中自己学习接受教育。很多家长选择让自己的小孩在家中学习而不是去学校。这有优缺两方面。

        父母选择在家中自己教育孩子的主要原因是他们可以因材施教。因为每个小孩都有自己不同的爱好和才能,在家中接受教育可以完全的发挥他们的`聪明才智。

        另一方面,小孩健康全面的发展归于各方面能力的开发。一些有益的课外活动有利于必修课程的补充。如果只鼓励他们学习课本上的东西,他们就不可能得到全面的发展。 他们自己的个性和创意就毫无疑问的会削弱,因为我们的社会是一个多元化的社会。应该鼓励孩子们多接触社会上各种各样的事物来达到更多的全面的知识。

        因此,我的观点是,让小孩到学校接受老师的教育更好!

关于思想教育方面的英文文章(急)

       

       教育是立国之本,民族兴旺的标记,一个国家有没有发展潜力看的是教育,这个国家富不富强看的也是教育。下面,我帮你整理了,希望你喜欢!

        篇1

       China, as a developing country, has a large gap pared with developed countries. If we want to catch up with and even surpass the developed ones, education seems important and should be given the first priority. Besides, education seems the same important to individuals.

       In modern time, when science and technology are making great progress, the education of the work force is the most important. Moreover, many of the success in advanced countries have demonstrated that a nation's prosperity mainly depends on the quality of its labor force, namely those who have been well educated.

       

       For individuals, education is the best way to improve oneself. Firstly, it's education thathelps people gain basic knowledge of the world, helping them to distinguish what is right and wrong. Secondly, education improves one's skills of life and work, which can make people live a good life or have achievements in career. Finally, education brings people ability of learning and that is the key role of education.

        篇2

       Almost everyone in the world has taken education. But, not everyone realize its importance. In fact, it plays a vital place in all people’s life. It helps people understand the world better, make preparation for their future and form good quality.

       Firstly, it is well-known that school is the best place to receive education, so the knowledge in school is very widely. It is obvious to see that there are so many books and knowledgeable teachers in school being ready to teach students. Through the school education, students can have a better understanding of the things happening in the world. Secondly, as students can learn so much knowledge in school, they can use this knowledge to work for them in the future after they graduate. Or students also can figure out their interest by searching the knowledge of various fields to clear their future road. Last but not least, education can help a person form good qualities. The more knowledge a person learns the more polite, modest and high quality he will be. A well educated person always behaves pretty well.

       In a word, education is very important for anyone. It will affect human beings’ whole life in the inside heart and outside appearance. We should catch every chance to receive education, if we want to success in the future.

        篇3

       Nowadays it is a very mon phenomenon that some university students are late for or even absent from classes. And still there are some students who slip out of the classroom before the class is over. Class attendance has bee a thorny problem to both the students and teachers.

       In fact, it is very important for the students to attend their classes regularly. First, it will ensure you to catch up with the teachers in your learning. That is very helpful to you if you want to do a good job in your study. Second, attending classes regularly is a way of showing respect to your teachers ,too. Your teachers will feel bad if the students do not attend their classes, which, in turn, will affect their teaching and be no good for the students. Third, attending classes regularly will help to form a good habit of punctuality, which is of great importance for the students to do a good job in the future.

       Therefore, we university students should form the good habit of attending our classes regularly from now on. And some day we’ll benefit from it.

急求英文作文:教育对社会的作用或者是影响、贡献 急求,在线等

       找了两篇文章.供你参考.

       1.Morality in Education

       More than ever, opportunities should be afforded to families that wish to bring their children up with a moral education in accordance with their beliefs. A system of choice allows parents to choose schools that inject moral or religious themes into their children’s education.

       Further Reading:

       “Faith Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution?”

       by Marvin Olasky

       “Can Public Schools Teach Character?”

       by Dr. Perry Glanzer

       “Leading Children Beyond Good & Evil”

       by Dr. James Davison Hunter

       An Education for a Good Life

       by Clark Durant

       FEATURED ARTICLE:

       “The Myth of a Value-Free Education”

       by Dr. Ronald Nash

       Americans love myths. By "myth," I do not mean the old-fashioned myths that my generation read in grade school. Many Americans would find reading at that fifth-grade level too difficult these days. What I mean by "myth" is what older generations used to call a fiction.

       One of the more influential myths presently affecting the American family is the myth of a value-free education. A value-free education is described as one in which students are supposed to be free from any coerced exposure to the values of anyone.

       One way the defenders of value-free education frame their argument is this: they argue that because America ceased to be a homogeneous society a long time ago, the watchword today must be pluralism. In the new setting of today, they insist, we can no longer stress the values and beliefs of some, while ignoring the values of all. And so, they say, we’ll avoid all the problems inherent in this situation by simply agreeing to ignore all values. This specious argument deceives Americans into thinking this is the only way to achieve fairness in our schools.

       College students today are surrounded by an allegedly academic setting in which the things they find most obvious are confusion, conflicting claims and the absence of any fixed points of reference. America’s colleges have become centers of intellectual disorder. As David Gress explains, "Instead of being havens of independent thought, universities have become channels of indoctrination…confirming the prejudices of those who control the agenda of public discourse." Ralph Bennett is surely right when he warns that "behind its ivy-colored camouflage, American higher education is a fraud—untrue to its students, untrue to itself."

       The inadequacies of contemporary education are not exclusively matters of the mind. Traditional religious and moral values are under assault at every level of public and higher education. Our educational system is engaged in a systematic undermining of these values.

       Our educational crisis is to some extent a closing of the American mind, as Allan Bloom examined in his best selling book of that title. But it is also something more profound, a closing of the American heart. No real progress towards improving American education can occur until all of us realize that an education that ignores moral and religious beliefs cannot qualify as a quality education. Recently, no less a person than Mikhail Gorbachev admitted that the major reason his nation is in such trouble is because his people are ignorant of moral and spiritual values.

       The development of the intellect and of moral character are intimately related. Just as there is an order in nature (the laws of science), in reason (the laws of logic), and in the realm of numbers, so too is there a moral order. One thing we need to do is recover the belief that there is a transcendent, unchanging moral order, and restore it once more to a central place in the educational process.

       Throughout history, important thinkers have contended that there is a higher order of permanent things (like moral norms), that human happiness is dependent on living our lives in accordance with this transcendent order, and that peace and order within human society require respect for this order. The most important task of education is to continually remind students of the existence and importance of this transcendent order as well as of its content.

       If teachers are doing their job properly, they serve as an essential link in the chain of civilization. Without this link, the chain cannot hold. Teachers are the conservers of culture; they are also its transmitters. At least, that’s the role that teachers used to play.

       Modern education in America has largely separated virtue and knowledge. The Sophists of our age have severed the link between reason and virtue, between the mind and the heart; there is objective truth out there, which it is our duty to pursue and discover. But there is also an objective moral order out there, as well as in here. An adequate education dare not ignore either the mind or the heart. Just as we dare not divorce education from matters of the heart, so too we must not separate education from religion. Like any important human activity, education has an inescapable religious component.

       Religious faith is not just one isolated compartment of a person’s life—a compartment that we can take or leave as we wish. Religious faith is rather a dimension of life that colors, affects and influences everything we do and believe. Human beings are incurably religious, as John Calvin once said. Paul Tillich was right when he defined religion as a matter of "ultimate concern." Every person has something that concerns him ultimately and whatever that may be, the ultimate concern will have an enormous influence on everything else the person does or believes.

       Since every human being has something about which he is ultimately concerned, it follows that every human being has a God. No human being can possibly be neutral when it comes to religion. When an individual encounters people who claim that education should be free of any religious content, he should recognize that this is not a religiously neutral claim. Rather it is an assertion that reflects the religious commitments of the person making it. There is a sense in which education is an activity that is religious at its roots. Any effort to remove religion from education is merely the substitution of one set of ultimate religious commitments for another.

       It is absurd then to think that a choice between the sacred and secular in education is possible. Whatever the state and the courts do regarding education will only establish one person’s set of ultimate (religious) concerns at the expense of someone else’s.

       Nothing will remedy the problems of American education more quickly and more effectively than the introduction of greater freedom and choice in education. We should seek a permanent end to the situation that allows the state to determine where children must attend school, if that child is to receive a free public education. American families should have complete freedom to send their children to any school they wish, without the added financial burden of paying private school tuition. One way to realize this objective is through educational vouchers. Following the institution of a voucher system, public monies for education would not pass directly to schools. Rather, that money would be given first to the families of school-age children in the form of vouchers. Parents would then use those vouchers to pay for their children’s education at a school of their own choosing.

       Perhaps the major reason why public schools are so bad is because they have no competition; they are immune to market-discipline. Consequently, public schools have no incentive to offer a better product at a lower cost. A pro-choice movement in education would give public schools serious competition for the first time in more than a century. (Notice the implication here: many Americans are unaware of the fact that for generations, America’s public schools did not enjoy a monopoly with regard to public financial support.)

       It is not enough that we simply increase choice among public schools. The governmental monopoly over publicly funded education is a large part of our problem. It is imperative that educational choice be expanded to include the option of attending without financial penalty, without the burden of double taxation, any school that any family wishes, including church-operated private schools. The best and quickest way to improve the quality of education is to allow families to choose their school and let the competition of the market determine which schools prosper and which schools die. In the process, families will be able to select schools, not only on the basis of academic quality, but also with a view to the moral and spiritual values fostered by the school.

       Dr. Ronald Nash is Professor of Theology and Philosophy at Reformed Theological Seminary

       monly in a Christian worldview or a Judeo-Christian philosophy, even many who would not characterize themselves as particularly “religious.” Yet the personalistic approach to identification of “virtue“ failed to bring about a more moral society but has, instead, resulted in moral decline. Public schools had long since deferred from their original roles in morality and character education and even many churches or religious organizations were not picking up the slack (Meade, 1990

       A Major Study on the Morals and Ethics of Children

       In March 1990, Robert Coles, a child psychiatrist and Harvard professor, one who called himself “a member of the liberal intellectual left”, was quoted as wistfully recalling “the good old days when religion was taught in the schools” (Meade, 1990). Coles sensed a void--something missing from American homes and schools-- missing for years. Coles directed a major research project. The missing element was, they concluded, a strong, unarguable notion of right and wrong, good and bad.

       Coles’ findings revealed a nation of children who have a complicated belief system that usually runs counter to traditional values. “There was an unmistakable erosion of children’s faith in, and support for, traditional sources of authority.” More than parents, teachers or authoritative officials, children turned to peers for guidance on matters of right and wrong. Coles described conversations with many kids whose consciences he said were “not all that muscular.” (Meade, 1990)

       The New Character Education

       A new ground swell is observed forming in the 1990’s seeking to restore ethics, morality, and virtue to a central focus in public schooling. More than 30 educational leaders from state school boards, teachers' unions, universities, ethics centers, youth organizations, and religious groups met in 1992 at the Josephson Institute of Ethics. They formulated eight principles for character education— The Aspen Declaration on Character Education. (Lickona, 1993). In March of 1993, a national coalition for character development formed with representatives from business, government, and education, as well as churches. They began to formulate an agenda for reinstituting morality in public school curriculum and instruction. (Haynes 1994)

       Four Reasons for Character Education

       Young people increasingly hurt themselves and others because they lack awareness of moral values. Effective character education improves student behavior, makes schools more civil communities, and leads to improved academic performance. Many students come to school with little moral teaching from their parents, communities or religious institutions. We know today that the inclusion of character development emphases within the curriculum of our schools will do the following.

       1. Add Meaning to Education

        Moral questions are among the great questions facing the individual person and the human race. There is no such thing as a value-free education. Schools teach values every day by design or default.

       2. Sustain and Strengthen our Culture

       Transmitting moral values to the next generation has always been one of the more important functions of a civilization. Democracies have a special need for moral education, because democracy is government of and by the people themselves.

       3. Model Civility

       There is broad based and growing support for character education in the schools. Common ground exists on core moral values although there may be significant disagreement on the applicationof some of these values to certain controversial issues (Nyland and MacDonald, 1997). The Boyer Institute has been actively promoting research that reveals North American core values (or “common virtu,” also referred to as “common decency.” Honesty, responsibility, self-discipline, giving, compassion, perseverance, and loving are virtue terms most often cited. However, in application, “honesty” can be applied differently according to other elements of the actor’s worldview or philosophy. Compassion and/or responsibility might look different among the sub-groups citing these terms.

       4. Build True Character

       Thus, a person of true character, according to experts, is trustworthy, treats all people with respect, acts responsibly, maintains self-control, is fair and just, is caring, pursues excellence, and is an all around desirable citizen.

       A State Education Code Basis for Teaching Fundamental Moral Values

       Though often humorously critiqued as a state that is less than ‘virtuous’ in its social ethic, nevertheless, California, as a state, has raised the bar for public schools and virtue-based curriculum for several decades. Ever since the 1970s the California legislature has aggressively addressed the question of values and virtue in the curriculum, though this often went unnoticed or unheralded by the media or even the schools themselves. Currently, California Ed. Code 44806 tells us that it is the duty of teachers to “impress upon the minds of pupils the principles of morality, truth, justice, patriotism, and a true comprehension of rights, duties, and dignity of American citizenship...” The code further directs us to teach students to . . .

       avoid idleness, profanity, and falsehood, and to instruct them in the manners and morals and the principles of a free government. Each teacher shall endeavor to impress upon the minds of the pupils the principles of morality, truth, justice, patriotism, a true comprehension of the rights, duties and dignity of American citizenship, including: kindness toward domestic pets and the humane treatment of living creatures.

       In Moral and Civic Education and Teaching About Religion, the Board directs school personnel to teach students about: morality, including respect for differences and the significance of religion; truth; open discussion; justice; patriotism; self-esteem; integrity; empathy, including the “golden rule” (The Christian Bible, Matthew 7:12); exemplary conduct; moral interaction and ethical reflection; and the capacity to recognize values, including respect for the family, property, reliability, and for law.

       Morality

       The California Board of Education says, “School personnel must foster in students an understanding of the moral values that form the foundation of American society.” California teachers must teach students that citizens in a free society respect the worth and dignity of others, as well as their freedom of conscience. Religion is to be presented and viewed as primary source for the presence of basic moral principals. While no individual religious system may be prescribed, school faculty must help students recognize the sources of morality in history, law, and experience and must help students appreciate the significant contributions of religion, including the sacredness of human life and belief in freedom of worship. Morality is defined as “responsibility for personal decisions and conduct and the obligation to demonstrate concern about the well-being of others, along with showing respect for living creatures and the physical environment.”

       Truth

       California teachers are required to help students understand truth and the necessity for truth in a free and democratic society. Telling and expecting to be told the truth is an essential element among free and democratic peoples. Imagine a word study on the concept of truth, drawn from the Bible and other texts, obtaining definitions of truth

       Justice

       Justice is defined as “fairness in dealing with others, and is considered a hallmark of American society.” The California Board of Education said that “one owes to oneself and to others the obligation to engage in a constant effort to see that justice is attained.”

       Patriotism

       Jesus, quoted in Matthew 22:21, (The Christian Bible) instructs people to give to the government that which it was due (give to Caesar that which is Caesar's...) and to reflect similar obedience in relationship to God. Loyalty to one’s government is taught throughout Judeo Christian thought and scriptures, being only excepted by loyalty to God. In the case of our nation, we pledge to it as “one nation under God”. Such a concept bears full discussion in our classrooms, though such discussions must be sensitive and appropriate for the age and maturation levels of the students involved.

       Self-esteem

       The California Board of Education says that “Self-esteem and esteem for others are based on the intrinsic worth and dignity of individuals, not on academic ability or physical prowess. Jesus said that we must love others as we love ourselves (Matthew 19:19 ff), that normal human beings do esteem themselves, love themselves, provide for their own basic needs by nature. It is with God’s permission that we do so. This discussion is authorized in California classrooms.

       Integrity

       The California Board of Education tells us “School personnel should encourage students to live and speak with integrity; that is, to be trustworthy. To foster integrity is to help build character, to assist students to be honest with themselves, to promote a wholeness unimpaired by self-deceit, and to encourage the development of reliability in relations with others.” In view of recent questions about the integrity among business and government leaders, may would suggest that there is a curriculum related rationale for teachers

有没有什么英语作文是关于 教育和一个国家?

       Knowledge change destiny (知识改变命运)

        As we all know: knowledge change destiny.(众所周知:知识改变命运。)Knowledge of who is a teacher, teachers belonging to the service industry, education world a lot of sweat, irrigation with each student's heart.(知识的传播者是老师,教师属于服务业,在教育天地里挥洒着汗水,灌溉着每一个学子的心田。)

       Social progress depend on Science and technology, power comes from the knowledge of science and technology, knowledge derived from education.{社会的进步依靠科技,科技的力量来源于知识,知识来源于教育。)

       The saying goes, national rejuvenation through science and education. Education. Effects affect not only individuals, to social progress and the driving force.

       (正所谓,科教兴国。教育不仅仅影响个人,还对社会的进步有推动力量。)

       Have to admit, the impact of education. Facts have proved that a society's progress, a country's progress, and must rely on education.

       (不得不承认,教育的影响很大。事实证明,一个社会的进步,一个国家的进步,都要依靠教育。)

       楼主看看ok不。纯属自己写作,你在百度上,找不到的。

       Education in China.

       Education in China is a state-run system of public education run by the Ministry of Education. All citizens must attend school for at least nine years, known as the nine-year compulsory education, which the government funds. It includes six years of primary education, starting at age six or seven, and three years of junior secondary education (middle school) for ages 12 to 15. Some provinces may have five years of primary school but four years for middle school. After middle school, there are three years of high school, which then completes the secondary education. The Ministry of Education reported a 99 percent attendance rate for primary school and an 80 percent rate for both primary and middle schools. In 1985, the government abolished tax-funded higher education, requiring university applicants to compete for scholarships based on academic ability. In the early 1980s the government allowed the establishment of the first private school, increasing the number of undergraduates and people who hold doctoral degrees fivefold from 1995 to 2005.In 2003 China supported 1,552 institutions of higher learning (colleges and universities) and their 725,000 professors and 11 million students. There are over 100 National Key Universities, including Peking University and Tsinghua University. Chinese spending has grown by 20% per year since 1999, now reaching over $100bn, and as many as 1.5 million science and engineering students graduated from Chinese universities in 2006. China published 184,080 papers as of 2008. China has also become a top destination for international students. As of 2013, China is the most popular country in Asia for international students, and ranks third overall among countries.

       我只能帮您这么多了,您采纳,我很高心。

       今天关于“关于教育的英语作文题目”的讨论就到这里了。希望通过今天的讲解,您能对这个主题有更深入的理解。如果您有任何问题或需要进一步的信息,请随时告诉我。我将竭诚为您服务。